In his online chat this morning, Washingtonian critic Todd Kliman reflected a little on the state of food criticism in DC: "It's not the same game it was 15 years ago, when you had a couple of critics and nothing else except word of mouth, and for that reason I don't think a critic in my position — especially writing for a monthly — can write the same kind of review as he or she would have 15 years ago." Kliman also compared his work with that of the Post's Tom Sietsema, adding that he tends to give benefit of the doubt to "the little places." [Washingtonian]
Filed under:
